in the Interest of H.S.B., a Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the trial court had the discretion to resolve conflicts in the testimony to determine whether the father maintained a significant relationship with the child
• finding that the trial court had the discretion to resolve conflicts in the testimony in determining whether the father maintained a significant relationship with the child
• finding that the trial court had the discretion to resolve conflicts in the testimony to determine whether the father maintained a significant relationship with the child
• finding that the trial court had the discretion to resolve conflicts in the testimony in determining whether the father maintained a significant relationship with the child
• finding that the trial court had the discretion to resolve conflicts in the testimony to determine whether the father maintained a significant relationship with the child
• finding that name change was not in child’s best interest where 10 father cited “tradition” as the reason for the change, but made no attempt to link “tradition” with any factors relevant to the child’s best interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).