Skip to main content
· 2/12/2004

in the Interest of H.D.H. and C.M.H.

Citations

  • 127 S.W.3d 921
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 1492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We must determine whether, on the record before us [i.e., from the frivolousness hearing], the trial court abused its discretion in finding appellant presented no substantial question for appellate review and in finding the appeal to be frivolous....”
  • “We must determine whether, on the record before us [i.e., from the frivolousness hearing], the trial court abused its discretion in finding appellant presented no substantial question for appellate review and in finding the appeal to be frivolous . . . .”
  • Department’s statement at hearing that there was no evidence to terminate father on grounds that he knowingly placed or allowed children to remain in conditions that endangered physical or emotional well being was judicial admission that supported an arguable basis for appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKeithen, Burgess, Gaultney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.