in the Interest of H.A.B. and J.B., Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that comity abstention was appropriate where the plaintiff sought relief that “directly affect[ed] the administration of the state courts and ‘would run contrary to the basic principles of equity, comity, and federalism’”
• suggesting that “privacy concerns” weigh against “the interest in public disclosure” under Press-Enterprise II
• explaining that the abstention doc- trines were “not a perfect fit, and we ultimately base our de- cision on the more general principles of federalism that un- derlie all of the abstention doctrines”
• characterizing “a delay of no more than one business day in access to the vast majority of electronically filed complaints” as “minimal”
• abstaining from enjoining the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook County to release newly filed complaints at the moment of receipt
• discussing abstention principles in circumstances where state judicial remedies are available but have not been invoked

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).