In the Interest of H. W. A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where party did not object to witness’s invocation of privilege and did not move to strike testimony, no error preserved
• “The true rule is that when a witness declines to answer on cross-examination certain pertinent questions relevant to a matter testified about by the witness on direct examination, all of the witness’ testimony on the same subject matter should be stricken.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).