in the Interest of G.T. and D.M.T., Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in reaching its verdict, the jury is “free to reject certain evidence, and credit other evidence” (citation omitted)
• recognizing that a jury is free to reject certain evidence and credit other evidence
• noting that although the vehicle clearly met the first prong, the “pivotal issue” was whether the second prong had been met
• noting that although the vehicle clearly met the first prong, the “pivotal issue” was whether the second prong had been met
• noting that although the vehicle clearly met the first prong, the “pivotal issue” was whether the second prong had been met
• noting that although the vehicle clearly met the first prong, the “pivotal issue” was whether the second prong had been met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).