In the Interest of Goodwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Mills v. Rogers , 457 U.S. 291 , 102 S.Ct. 2442 , 2451, 73 L.Ed.2d 16 (1982)
• relying on Mills v. Rogers, 102 S.Ct. 2442, 2451 (1982) (other citations omitted). See also State ex rel. Stutsman v. Light, 68 N.D. 513, 521, 281 N.W. 777, 780 (1938
• relying on Mills v. Rogers, 102 S.Ct. 2442, 2451 (1982) (other citations omitted). See also State ex rel. Stutsman v. Light, 68 N.D. 513, 521, 281 N.W. 777, 780 (1938
• relying on Mills v. Rogers , 457 U.S. 291 , 305, 102 S.Ct. 2442 , 73 L.Ed.2d 16 (1982) (citations omitted). See also State v. Light, 68 N.D. 513 , 521, 281 N.W. 777 , 780 (1938

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).