In the Interest of E.S.P., C.S.P., U.A.S.P., Children v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the absence of control as a factor weighing in favor of classifying the 32 demoted partners as employees
• listing additional information sought by the EEOC that “would bear on the unavoidably multifaetored determination” of whether the 32 should be treated as employers or employees
• listing additional information sought by the EEOC that “would bear on the unavoidably multifactored determination” of whether the 32 should be treated as employers or employees
• “the ADEA protects employees but not employers”
• “the ADEA protects employees but not employ- ers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).