Skip to main content
· 10/12/2012

In the Interest of E.N.C., J.A.C., S.A.L., N.A.G. and C.G.L.

Citations

  • 384 S.W.3d 796
  • 56 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 19
  • 2012 WL 4840710
  • 2012 Tex. LEXIS 866

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that federal Due Process Clause and Texas Family Code both mandate “heightened” standard of review of clear and convincing evidence in parental-rights termination cases
  • recognizing that federal due process clause and Family Code both mandate “heightened” standard of review of clear and convincing evidence in parental-rights termination cases
  • recognizing that federal due process clause and 35 Family Code both mandate “heightened” standard of review of clear and convincing evidence in parental-rights termination cases
  • recognizing that federal due process clause and Family Code both mandate “heightened” standard of review of clear and convincing evidence in parental rights termination cases
  • recognizing that federal Due Process Clause and Texas Family Code both mandate “heightened standard of review” of clear and convincing evidence in parental-rights termination cases
  • recognizing that federal due process clause and Family Code both mandate “heightened” standard of review of clear and convincing evidence in parental-rights termination cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.