Skip to main content
· 4/1/2024

In the Interest of: E.J.A., a Minor Pet of: E.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that ban on street newsracks left open ample alternative channels of communication because “the Newspapers are free to distribute their publications from the very same spot within the public forum where their newsracks have been located”
  • finding that ban on street newsracks left open ample alternative channels of communication because “the Newspapers are free to distribute their publications from the very same spot within the public forum where their newsracks have been located”
  • “[Ajesthetic interests constitute a significant government interest.”
  • noting but declining to resolve the disagreement
  • “[A]esthetic interests constitute a significant government interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.