In the Interest of: E.E.S., of: J.P., Mother

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding use of United States benchmark as a point of comparison for two possible surrogate values
• approving Commerce’s chosen source for surrogate value information where the only source submitted by plaintiffs lacked the “inherent reliability” of Commerce’s source
• upholding the use of a broader tariff category where the other data on the record were unreliable
• approving use of basket category of import statistics from Pakistan, rather than more product-specific data from India, where Commerce found substantial evidence on the record suggesting that the Indian data were “aberrational and unreliable”
• “The Court finds that the paramount objective of the statute is to obtain the most accurate determination of dumping margins utilizing the best information available within the broad outlines of the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).