In the Interest of D.L.F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[Thhe jury's verdict awarding damages for future medical expenses but not for diminished earning capacity was inconsistent.\
• exclusion of defendant's undisclosed witness after plaintiff already closed case-in-chief was not abuse of discretion, in part because court's ruling was narrowly crafted so witness could still testify on other subjects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).