in the Interest of D.G. Jr., and J.A.G., Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling for defendant was proper where judge found that retaliation was not “a determinative factor” in discharge
• finding individual liable under ch. 151B for vulgar joking despite fact that conduct was not sexually motivated
• interpreting Massachusetts statute proscribing sexual harassment to reach same-sex harassment perpetrated by heterosexual person
• finding individual liable under G.L.c. 151B for vulgar joking despite the fact that conduct was not sexually motivated
• interpreting Massachusetts statute proscribing sexual harassment to reach same-sex harassment perpetrated by heterosexual person
• sexual harassment not limited to conduct aimed at employee of opposite sex, nor to same-sex conduct when harasser is homosexual

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).