In the Interest of D v. N v. V v. D v. and M.D v. v. Department of Family and Protective Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that claims relied on in double patenting rejections are not treated as prior art
• stating that claims relied on in double patenting rejections are not treated as prior art

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).