in the Interest of C.Z., a Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that we are not required to adopt the opinion of an expert that is contrary to our own judgment
• rejecting an expert’s testimony as incredible when the expert’s opinion of value was so exaggerated as to make it unrealistic
• the Court is not required to adopt the opinion of an expert that is contrary to its own judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).