in the Interest of C.R., a Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of special motion to dismiss because activities were not petitioning activities, and not because plaintiff and defendant were competing corporations “frequently, if not constantly, involved in proceedings before courts and other governmental entities”
• despite a pending arbitration appeal, disparaging remarks to a newspaper about a competitor were deemed neither connected to, nor in furtherance of, governmental consideration or review
• denial of corporation’s special motion to dismiss against its corporate competitor was proper where challenged activities were not petitioning but merely tangential comments and incidental observations that concerned topic that attracted governmental attention
• items listed “are meant to be illustrative, not exhaustive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).