In the Interest of C.M., A.R., and A.A., Minor Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of a defendant's prior bad act is admissible to show he or she acted with a common scheme or plan under ER 404(b)
• holding that evidence of a defendant’s prior bad act is admissible to show he or she acted with a common scheme or plan under ER 404(b)
• stating that court rules prevail in procedural matters, which pertain to mechanical operations of the courts in which substantive law, rights, and remedies are effectuated
• stating that court rules prevail in procedural matters, which pertain to mechanical operations of the courts in which substantive law, rights, and remedies are effectuated
• holding instructional error was harmless in Schemer's case, due to \overwhelming evidence of Schemer's guilt\
• holding that the rules of evidence are procedural

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).