in the Interest of C.C.E., Jr., a Child v. .

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an inference drawn from speculative testimony is an unreasonable inference and that \[s]peculative testimony is not competent substantial evidence\
• “Speculative testimony is not competent substantial evidence.”
• “Speculative testimony is not competent substantial evidence.”
• “Speculative testimony is not competent substantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).