in the Interest of C.C. and S.C., Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We do not consider the Supreme Court’s silence on an issue that was not presented dispositive.”
• “It is not our function to engraft on a statute additions which we think the legislature logically might or should have made.” (Branch, J., dissenting) (quoting United States v. Cooper Corp., 312 U.S. 600, 605, 61 S. Ct. 742, 744, 85 L. Ed. 1071, 1075 (1941))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).