In the Interest of C. W. D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \[t]he possession of a license in Georgia does not go to qualification as an expert witness but may go to the weight and credibility that a jury gives to such expert's opinion\ in a case that involved testimony by a psychologist who was not licensed in Georgia
• evidence of past conduct may be used to demonstrate that deprivation is likely to continue
• children testified and were cross-examined via closed-circuit television after juvenile court determined that making them testify in mother’s presence would be detrimental to their health
• children permitted to testify via closed circuit television where they had allegedly suffered physical, psychological, and emotional abuse by parent
• “Formal education or training in an area of expertise is not necessary, provided the witness possesses the qualifications of such area of expertise through skill and experience.”
• individual trained as psychologist qualified as expert, though not licensed in Georgia

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).