In the Interest of C. S., a Minor Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Rahimi and Bruen “can be read harmoniously” with “previous decisions rejecting as-applied challenges to Section 922(g)(1
• concluding that “nothing in Bruen or Rahimi” would undermine the Fourth Circuit’s earlier reliance on Heller to uphold the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1)
• holding that “neither Bruen nor Rahimi abrogate[d] this Court’s precedent foreclosing as-applied challenges to Section 922(g)(1)”
• concluding that possession of firearms by persons convicted of felony offenses is an activity that falls outside the scope of the Second Amendment as originally understood
• holding that, post-Bruen, § 922(g)(1) convictions are not susceptible to as-applied Second Amendment challenges
• holding that New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), does not “abrogate[] this Court’s precedent foreclosing as-applied challenges to Section 922(g)(1) and those decisions thus remain binding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).