In the Interest of B.W., K.M., and S.M., Minor Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing two narrow exceptions - for clerical errors and fraud - to the rule that a Rule 60(b
• stating that in Calderon, the Supreme Court recognized 9 that a mandate in a habeas case can be recalled when there was a fraud on the court, creating a question about the legitimacy of the judgment
• noting the “total ban on claims that were presented in a prior petition” (emphasis added)
• \The central purpose behind the AEDPA was to ensure greater finality of state and federal court judgments in criminal cases....\
• \One of the most popular vehicles used in the attempted end-runs [around AEDPA] is a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion requesting that the prior judgment denying relief be set aside.\
• “One of the most popular vehicles used in the attempted end-runs [around AEDPA] is a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion requesting that the prior judgment denying relief be set aside.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).