In the Interest of B.R., S.R. and S.R., Children v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellant’s guilty plea was provident, despite her bipolar diagnosis, where the military judge (1
• holding that the appellant’s guilty plea was provident, despite her bipolar diagnosis, where the military judge (1
• holding that the appellant’s guilty plea was provident, despite her bipolar diagnosis, where the military judge (1
• finding reference to a bipolar disorder, with no further evidence that the condition affected the accused’s mental responsibility, at most raised only the mere possibility of a defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).