In the Interest of B.R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding violent conduct directed at the other parent may be sufficient to demonstrate course of conduct under Subsection E
• determining it incongruous to require trial courts to require an enhanced burden of proof while appellate courts applied the same appellate review accorded to preponderance-of-the-evidence issues
• determining it incongruous to require trial courts to require an enhanced burden of proof while appellate courts applied the same appellate review accorded to prepon-deranee-of-the-evidence issues
• “E vidence of a parent’s imprisonment may contribute to a finding that the parent engaged in a course of conduct which endangered a child’s physical or emotional well-being.”
• proof of endangerment does not require actual injury, rather \it is sufficient that the child's well-being be jeopardized or exposed to loss or injury\ and such jeopardy or exposure may be inferred from the parent's misconduct
• proof of endangerment does not require actual injury, rather “it is sufficient that the child’s well-being be jeopardized or exposed to loss or injury” and such jeopardy or exposure may be inferred from the parent’s misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).