in the Interest of B.J.E., a Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that persons charging fee for running private poker games were engaged in illegal business of accepting bets or wagers
• holding that poker is covered by a state gambling statute which defines gambling as betting on the result of any game of skill or chance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).