In the Interest of B.J., Minor Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, because “the defendant was absolutely privileged to publish the allegedly defamatory statements at issue,” the defendant was entitled to summary judgment as to the plaintiff’s libel, slander, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).