in the Interest of B.C. and A.B., Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in light of Rule 8’s liberal pleading standard, “a 5 plaintiff may pursue multiple, even if inconsistent, theories of recovery” and “a pleading 6 should not be construed as an admission against another alternative or inconsistent 7 pleading”
• reversing dismissal and remanding after recognizing plaintiffs opportunity to plead inconsistent theories of recovery
• “In light of the liberal pleading policy embodied in [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(e
• “Plaintiffs’ state law claims are not 5 based on alleged conduct that is ‘in connection with’ the purchase or sale of any 6 covered securities.”
• “[A] plaintiff can pursue multiple, even if inconsistent, theories of recovery in the 9 same suit[.]”
• “In light of the liberal pleading policy embodied in [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(e)], ... a pleading should not be construed as an admission against another alternative or inconsistent pleading in the same case, at least at the initial pleading stage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).