In the Interest of A.W. and A.RB.W., Children v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• district court’s findings of 'fact that were premised upon incorrect standard of law are not binding on appeal
• A court should not lightly infer an abandonment of unlawful activities “from a cessation which seems timed to anticipate suit.”
• “under the Colgate doctrine a manufacturer, having announced a ... policy, may bring about adherence to it by refusing to deal with customers who do not observe that policy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).