in the Interest of A.S.G., a Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that legislators must be permitted to take some “partisan interests into account when drawing district lines”
• holding that claims of partisan motivation in map drawing is not cognizable under the United States Constitution
• holding that claims of partisan gerrymandering stemming from legislatively enacted maps are nonjusticiable
• holding that claims of partisan gerrymandering stemming from legislatively enacted maps are nonjusticiable
• holding that claims of unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering present nonjusticiable political questions
• reiterating that a claim based on the Guarantee clause is not “properly suited for resolution by federal courts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).