Skip to main content
· 8/28/1995

In the Interest of A.R.W.

Citations

  • 903 P.2d 10
  • 1994 WL 484948

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that weaving into another lane provided 12 reasonable suspicion to stop
  • applying \newly discovered evidence\ exception from an 14 older version of Arizona Rule 26(b)(5)
  • allocation of exemption in alternate years to parent earning 61.9% of the total income approved
  • in contrast to role of child’s GAL in dependency and neglect proceedings or dissolution of marriage actions, GAL for child in paternity action is neither a party nor counsel for the child and has no right to control the proceedings, defend the action, or appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rothenberg, Ney, Casebolt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.