in the Interest of A.M.W., a Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that plaintiff may proceed under theory of negligence in proving design defect
• “a design is not objectively unreasonable unless the plaintiff can show that an alternative design is safer overall than the design used by the manufacturer.”
• “The subjective expectations of a single user, however, are not sufficient to establish the objective, reasonable expectations of consumers as a class.”
• “Virginia has not adopted a strict liability 2 Henderson’s complaint “incorporate[d] The Master Complaint in MDL No. 2326,” (ECF No. 1, at 1), and adopted the allegations in Counts I-VI, VIII, and IX, (id. 13.). regime for products liability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).