in the Interest of A.M.A., a Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that negligent misrepresentation plaintiff “must prove that the defendant ... supplies false information ... causing and resulting in ... loss ... by their justifiable reliance upon the information” (emphasis added)
• recognizing “[a]n exception to the [economic loss] doctrine . . . for economic losses resulting from negligent misrepresentation”
• determining that a subcontractor’s claims against an architect for misrepresentations with regard to the architect’s plans and specifications and bad faith decisions in resolving the subcontractor’s disputes was actionable conduct under c. 93A
• noting an exception to the economic loss doctrine exists for negligent misrepresentation claims based on Restatement (Second) section 552
• noting that “Supreme Judicial Court has held that liability will be imposed in Massachusetts for the negligent furnishing of services to one not a party to the contract where the defendant knows that the party will rely on his services”
• noting an exception to the economic loss doctrine exists for negligent misrepresentation claims based on Restatement (Second) section 552

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).