In the Interest of A.M. and A.M., Minor Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a policy provision requiring a set-off of liability insurance payments against amount payable under UM coverage is “void as against public policy”
• explaining that, in Bayer, “[t]he declarations page of [the] policy contained a specific section addressing vehicles included for the purpose of the UM coverage,” which the Bayer court relied on for its holding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).