In the Interest of: A.G.C., a Minor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[plaintiff] must show that he has standing under Article III, and that he satisfies third-party, or jus tertii, standing requirements” (emphasis original)
• stating that appellant “cannot avoid mootness by asserting the rights of third parties when she herself fails to meet Article III’s requirements”
• finding “opposing side’s silence” in the face of a party’s request for vacatur to “significant[ly]” weigh in favor of granting the request
• “[plaintiff] must show that he has standing under Article III, and that he satisfies third party, or jus tertii, standing requirements.”
• “Because vacatur is equitable in nature, we look to notions of fairness when deciding whether to use the remedy.”
• \[plaintiff] contributed to its pursuit of its purpose.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).