In the Interest of A.G., G.H., A.G., S.H. and A.M., Minor Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that an “injunction” is “an eq- uitable decree compelling obedience under the threat of contempt”
• recognizing that an “injunction” is “an eq- uitable decree compelling obedience under the threat of contempt”
• recognizing that an “injunction” is “an eq- uitable decree compelling obedience under the threat of contempt”
• stating that an order qualified as \ ‘order granting an injunction’ with the meaning of Rule 65(d)” where \it was an equitable decree compelling obedience under the threat of contempt”
• reversing finding of civil contempt for alleged violation of vague decree
• “The judicial contempt power is a potent weapon. When it is founded upon a decree too vague to be understood, it can be a deadly one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).