in the Interest of A.B. and H.B., Children

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that factfinder had “full opportunity to observe witness testimony first-hand” and assess “the credibility and demeanor of witnesses”
• holding that factfinder had “full opportunity to observe witness testimony first- hand” and was “the sole arbiter when assessing credibility and demeanor of witnesses”
• holding that an appellate court that affirms a judgment terminating parental rights need not detail the evidence when performing a factual sufficiency review
• holding that an appellate court that affirms a judgment terminating parental rights need not detail the evidence when performing a factual sufficiency review
• holding that a voluntary, deliberate, and conscious course of conduct is required and that conduct which subjects a child to a life of uncertainty and instability endangers the child’s physical and emotional well-being
• holding that evidence supported an inference that father knew of and contributed to his daughter’s failure to thrive and, consequently, that father endangered her by underfeeding her and knowingly allowed her to remain in a malnourished condition that endangered her

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).