In the Interest D.L.W.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in multiple- punishments case, “the double-jeopardy analysis hinges on whether the Legislature intended multiple punishments”
• disapproving appellate court's use of \a/any test\ because statute at issue, violation of sexually violent predator civil-commitment order, is circumstance of conduct crime rather than nature of conduct crime as in Jones
• \[A] conviction with a pending appeal is not final until the appellate court affirms the conviction and issues its mandate.\
• statute criminalizing violations of sexually violent predator civil-commitment orders was circumstances-surrounding-conduct offense because violation arose only by circumstance that person had been adjudicated predator and civilly committed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).