Skip to main content
· 3/5/2024

In the Int. of: M.L.J.P., Petition of: A.M.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assuming that Marshall’s response that he did not believe his appointed counsel was qualified meant that he wanted to proceed pro se
  • reiterating the preeminence of the right to counsel and that the right to self-representation “does not attach unless and until it is asserted” (quotations omitted)
  • “Marshall never clearly stated his desire to proceed pro se. When asked to choose among the three options presented by the court — (1) continue with his appointed counsel, (2) represent himself with the aid of standby counsel, or (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.