In the Int. of: C.R., a Minor Appeal of: M.J.R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the applicable “standard of review in dependency cases requires an appellate court to accept the findings of fact -6- J-S31017-15 and credibility of the trial court if they are supported by the record”
• noting that foster parents could not stand in loco parentis because their status as foster parents was subordinate to the County Children & Youth Services Agency, which maintained legal custody and was primarily responsible for the child’s care and custody
• construing foster mother’s motions for permanency review hearings to be motions to intervene and affirming denial of them
• former foster parent, who waited six months and several permanency reviews to attempt intervention after foster children’s removal, did not have standing to intervene in dependency matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).