In the Int. of A.J.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that error was “substantial” because it created serious doubt regarding the reliability of the judgment of 10 conviction
• holding that an error was obvious “[i]n light of the well-settled legal principle upon which [the] rule is based, the prior references in Colorado case law to the rule, and the uniformity with which numerous other courts have embraced the rule”
• noting that such errors “must be so clear-cut, so obvious, that a trial judge should be able to avoid [them] without the benefit of an objection”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).