In the Guardianship of Martha Atelia Clarkson v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an agency's construction of its own regulations should be dispositive \[u]nless demonstrably irrational\
• holding that deference was appropriate to official staff opinions of Federal Reserve Board interpreting the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z, unless demonstrably irrational
• holding that an agency’s construction of its own regulations should be dispositive “[u]nless demonstrably irrational”
• holding that deference was appropriate to official staff opinions of Federal Reserve Board interpreting the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z, unless demonstrably irrational
• stating that courts should give “a high degree of deference” to the Federal Reserve Board’s interpretation of TILA
• noting that “the interpretation given [a] statute by the officers or agency charged with its administration is due considerable respect by the courts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).