In the Estate of Ramona Ledezma v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that FHLBB's regulation of day-to-day functions of bank fell within discretionary function exception to FTCA
• holding that “[discretionary conduct is not confined to the policy or planning level” and therefore rejecting “a nonexistent dichotomy between discretionary functions and .operational activities”
• holding that claims involving management decisions, including the “negligent selection of directors and officers,” were barred by the discretionary function exception
• holding that the discretionary function exception of the FTCA shielded United States from tort liability for allegedly negligent actions taken by banking regulators
• holding that actions taken by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board in supervising a savings and loan at the day-to-day operational level could come within the discretionary function exception to the FTCA
• holding that actions taken by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board in supervising a savings and loan at the day-to-day operational level could come within the discretionary function exception to the FTCA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).