In the Estate of Helen Gary v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Miranda does not foreclose the use of an unwarned statement to impeach a defendant's credibility if the statement was not coerced and given voluntarily
• holding that Miranda does not foreclose the use of an unwarned statement to impeach a defendant’s credibility if the statement was not coerced and given voluntárily
• holding that voluntary statements obtained in violation of Miranda are admissible on cross-examination for purposes of impeachment
• holding that the prosecution may impeach a testifying criminal defendant with voluntary statements police obtained in violation of Miranda
• holding that statements that were otherwise inadmissible due to a Miranda violation were admissible to impeach the defendant's trial testimony
• holding that statements that were otherwise inadmissible due to a Miranda violation were admissible to impeach the defendant’s trial testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).