In re:Contempt Order v.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an attorney’s absence for five minutes did not “occur within the presence of the court”
• noting that where an MJ issues summary criminal contempt sanctions under § 636 and in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 42, the analysis is the same as for a sanction issued by a district court under its inherent Article III powers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).