Skip to main content

In re Z.H.

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2596

Syllabus

Permanent custody; best interest of the child; R.C. 2151.414(B)(1); R.C. 2151.414(D)(1); R.C. 2151.414(E) factors; reasonable efforts; clear and convincing evidence; manifest weight of the evidence; sufficiency; Evid.R. 612; refreshing recollection. Affirmed. The juvenile court's decision granting permanent custody to the agency and terminating appellant's parental rights was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant failed to remedy the issues that caused the child's removal and demonstrated a lack of commitment towards the child. Finally, it was in the best interest of the child to grant permanent custody to the agency.

Judges: Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.