In Re Zendesk, Inc. Section 220 Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employer cannot grant discretionary pay increases prior to impasse without bargaining with the union over their size
• observing that the practice’s “destructive impact upon the strike and union activity cannot be doubted”
• noting that “[t]he employer ... must be held to intend the very consequences which foreseeably and inescapably flow from his actions”
• noting that courts must afford appropriate deference to the Board's expertise in \applying the general provisions of the Act to the complexities of industrial life\
• noting that courts must afford appropriate deference to the Board’s expertise in “applying the general provisions of the Act to the complexities of industrial life”
• granting superseniority to strike replacements inherently destructive since such seniority divides workforce into factions based on participation in strike

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).