Skip to main content
· 11/29/1993

In Re Zaleha

Citations

  • 162 B.R. 309
  • 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1842
  • 1993 WL 522282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • standing of a party who objects to a plan was irrelevant where he merely raised an issue that the court is required to decide regardless of whether there is an objection
  • explaining a transfer notice “clear[s] the court record of ambiguities regarding who actually holds a claim” and clarifies “who will be entitled to notice regarding the case, and distribution (if any) from the [bankruptcy] estate”
  • failure to comply with Rule 3001(e)(2) does not deprive claim purchaser of standing to object to plan confirmation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alfred C. Hagan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.