In Re Zahn Farms

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “the benefit of the views of the Judge who is familiar with the issues pertaining to any purported emergency”
• noting that requests to reinstate the § 362(a) stay are “governed [] by FRBP 7001(7), and require[] an [a]dversary [p]roceeding”
• holding that a showing “that at some unspecified point in the future a foreclosure sale and a sale of personalty will occur” is insufficient to show a threat of irreparable harm required for expedited review of an emergency motion under Rule 8011(d)
• holding that a showing “that at some unspecified point in the future a foreclosure sale and a sale of personalty will occur,” is insufficient to show a threat of irreparable harm required for expedited review of an emergency motion under Rule 8011(d)
• noting importance of bankruptcy court's familiarity with a proceeding in determining the necessity of a stay pending appeal
• noting importance of bankruptcy court’s familiarity with a proceeding in determining the necessity of a stay pending appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).