In Re Zachary G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that judicial estoppel “protects judicial integrity by preventing a party from prevailing in one phase of a case using one argument and then relying upon a contradictory argument to prevail in another phase” (quotation and brackets omitted)
• declining, in light of the potential adverse impact on the public interest, to apply collateral estoppel in termination of parental rights proceeding
• criticizing rule from The Evergreens and citing favorably a tentative draft of comment j
• criticizing rule from The Evergreens and citing favorably a tentative draft of comment j
• family division's findings will not be disturbed unless unsupported by the evidence or plainly erroneous as a matter of law
• explaining collateral estoppel under New Hampshire law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).