Skip to main content
· 11/21/2025

In re Z.A.

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 5247

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by granting permanent custody of mother's children to the public children services agency because they could not be returned to mother within a reasonable time and because it was in the best interest of the children to be placed in the permanent custody of the agency. The trial court also did not err in not granting mother a six-month extension to complete her case plan because an extension was not requested, and the record showed that an extension would not have facilitated mother's compliance with her case plan. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.