in Re Z K Rimson Minor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a rule 1.904(2) motion filed following district court’s grant of directed verdict was proper and tolled time for appeal
• stating that “perhaps the most widely adopted [approach] links oppression to the frustration of the reasonable expectations of the corporation’s shareholders”
• stating that “courts must be careful when determining relief to avoid giving the minority a foothold that is oppressive to the majority”
• declining to catalogue \all the categories of conduct and circumstances that will constitute oppression frustrating the reasonable expectations of minority shareholders' interests\
• noting “significant discrepancies between market value and book value have cast doubt on the enforceability of provisions requiring transfers at book value”
• noting the court had jurisdiction only if a party’s post-trial motion constituted a proper rule 1.904(2) motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).